2019 Roadmap Announcement

2019 Roadmap Announcement - Page: 3

Thread started by Asterix on Monday, 9:39am January 7th with 50 replies. Views: 7,611

-JAK
Posts: 320
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
in reply to NoS-'s post .



Or he just steps down as admin?

Quote from NoS- on the 7th of January 2019
yer & so will all the other invite admins & then this site will be run by cga

Quote from MentalJack on the 7th of January 2019
I dont see the issue, no demo reviews means CGA players wont be able to ban anyone by being an admin which imo is the only real cause for concern (other than the no POV bans)
Posted 12:47pm Jan 7th 19
kayoh
Posts: 94
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
exciting ;3
Posted 1:26pm Jan 7th 19
BoLTz
Posts: 475
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
in reply to NoS-'s post .



Or he just steps down as admin?

Quote from NoS- on the 7th of January 2019
yer & so will all the other invite admins & then this site will be run by cga

Quote from MentalJack on the 7th of January 2019
but deezys cga?
Posted 2:07pm Jan 7th 19
Roflko
Posts: 216
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
very cool
Posted 2:13pm Jan 7th 19
^MarQ
Posts: 3
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
Now this is epic
Posted 2:28pm Jan 7th 19
latosrevenge
Posts: 121
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
in reply to doris's post .


DEMO REVIEWS BEING REMOVED FOR BANS IS BIG NONO

eg; "in other news, doris starts spinbotting his way to cgpl lan with zero repercussions if the AC doesn't catch him???"

LOWQ

Quote from doris on the 7th of January 2019
+ the fact that unbanning certain players cucks other teams of ffyi's etc.
Posted 5:10pm Jan 7th 19
JawsOCE
Posts: 27
Level: PLATINUM
Reputation:
Hype?!?!
Posted 2:32am Jan 8th 19
HawkeyePierce
Posts: 3
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
CGa needs an active subscription for all players on the team or just the captain? Because that's $79 a month for to enter CGa seems a bit steep.
Posted 2:36am Jan 8th 19
DALEROXX
Posts: 5,899
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
in reply to HawkeyePierce's post .
Will be all players
Posted 5:05am Jan 8th 19
Kiwi Klasher
Posts: 1
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
Any more info available on Clash Royale? If not, when can we expect it?
Posted 5:42am Jan 8th 19
JawsOCE
Posts: 27
Level: PLATINUM
Reputation:
in reply to Kiwi Klasher's post .


Any more info available on Clash Royale? If not, when can we expect it?

Quote from Kiwi Klasher on the 8th of January 2019

Very soon, stay tuned on the website
Posted 6:19am Jan 8th 19
NoS-
Posts: 218
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
in reply to JawsOCE's post .


Hype?!?!

Quote from JawsOCE on the 8th of January 2019
yes ty 4 making the cg tournaments worth playing <3
Posted 7:34am Jan 8th 19
EXPloSeur
Posts: 6
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
in reply to Asterix's post .
Anti-cheat and fixing how demos cut off would be a great change.
Posted 8:59am Jan 8th 19
Sharpy!
Posts: 2,159
Level: BRONZE
Reputation:
relying on VAC to protect paid leagues. yikes well gg have fun in CGa to all those people playing legitimately, welcome all the pro 14 year olds to the scene and reward them for never having applied themselves to the game.

the idea of removing players from paid leagues to admin is a solid decision though, removes the bigger part of biasness and would require admins to take a more professional approach, rather than it being a way to inflate their e-peen or egos. powerslave is a good example.

"too time consuming" or "too costly" seems like a cop out for not introducing an anti-cheat. you have people pay subscriptions to compete in CGa and have entry fee's for higher leagues. besides paying for server costs and getting a profit for yourself, and CGa prize pool, where does the rest of the money go? :/
Posted 11:50am Jan 8th 19
Tham
Posts: 410
Level: PLATINUM
Reputation:
in reply to Sharpy!'s post .


relying on VAC to protect paid leagues. yikes well gg have fun in CGa to all those people playing legitimately, welcome all the pro 14 year olds to the scene and reward them for never having applied themselves to the game.

the idea of removing players from paid leagues to admin is a solid decision though, removes the bigger part of biasness and would require admins to take a more professional approach, rather than it being a way to inflate their e-peen or egos. powerslave is a good example.

"too time consuming" or "too costly" seems like a cop out for not introducing an anti-cheat. you have people pay subscriptions to compete in CGa and have entry fee's for higher leagues. besides paying for server costs and getting a profit for yourself, and CGa prize pool, where does the rest of the money go? :/

Quote from Sharpy! on the 8th of January 2019

If you were to properly look into anti-cheats you would realise that they actually cost hundreds of thousands to maintain. That's why you see ESEA and FACEIT use anti-cheats as they are a multi-million dollar company.

We are looking at every possible outcome and do strive to actively find an anti-cheat.

We actively try to improve and when we do we get certain individuals like yourself, who do not do any research on the matter come in and provide negative feedback. We provide a community and listen to all those who speak and will do our best to fit the needs of both the game and community.
Posted 1:40pm Jan 8th 19