EU
PC
z
GB
Rep:
83%
Member
Personally players who havent played for a couple of years shouldnt be allowed to walk back into the playing field like they left it. In all fairness i think its respect alone they were given high seed.

If TBA and Eraseme 'Deserve' top seed then they will show it at LAN by proving that their competition wasnt on their level.
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
PT
Rep:
82%
Member
can we see the lineUP for each team?
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
IL
Rep:
85%
Member
I think that the pressure is on the top tier teams. Like putting teams in a wrong seed makes a top tier team at risk of getting grouped.
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
GR
Rep:
74%
Member
Quote from darl1Ng on the 24th of March 2017:
I think that the pressure is on the top tier teams. Like putting teams in a wrong seed makes a top tier team at risk of getting grouped.
Do you really think any of these 3 teams in top tier may get grouped, and they are there just by fault?
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
NL
Rep:
77%
Member
Quote from runny on the 25th of March 2017:
Quote from darl1Ng on the 24th of March 2017:
I think that the pressure is on the top tier teams. Like putting teams in a wrong seed makes a top tier team at risk of getting grouped.
Do you really think any of these 3 teams in top tier may get grouped, and they are there just by fault?
Anything can happen at LAN! The teams are all pretty close to each other in skill tbh
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
IL
Rep:
85%
Member
Quote from runny on the 25th of March 2017:
Quote from darl1Ng on the 24th of March 2017:
I think that the pressure is on the top tier teams. Like putting teams in a wrong seed makes a top tier team at risk of getting grouped.
Do you really think any of these 3 teams in top tier may get grouped, and they are there just by fault?
You missunderstood me . I think all of them deserve that spot. The fact they are top seeded dones't mean they are safe. As froster said everything can happen. And yes top tier team might get grouped.
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
IL
Rep:
85%
Member
Quote from bluEz on the 24th of March 2017:
Quote from darl1Ng on the 24th of March 2017:
@FrosteR Is it matters for you if you are high seed or top seed?

Ofcourse it matters to him, he's gonna dodge a potential top seed lol
Well we can say the same. If Erasme is moving to a top seed then its good news for top seeded teams because they will dodge Erasme at the high tier :]
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
DE
Rep:
83%
EU Site Admin
Post Likes: 1
imo TBA > eraseme but that's mainly because I haven't seen any results of eraseme as they don't play in p2p. But TBA already beat GRS online so they've proven that they can be a top team.
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
NL
Rep:
84%
Member
Quote from darl1Ng on the 25th of March 2017:
Quote from bluEz on the 24th of March 2017:
Quote from darl1Ng on the 24th of March 2017:
@FrosteR Is it matters for you if you are high seed or top seed?

Ofcourse it matters to him, he's gonna dodge a potential top seed lol
Well we can say the same. If Erasme is moving to a top seed then its good news for top seeded teams because they will dodge Erasme at the high tier :]

The chances of you facing Eraseme as a top tier, are higher than the chances of you facing Eraseme as a high tier.

edit: nvm thought you were high tier
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
GB
Rep:
84%
EU News Writer
Quote from GoTTiii on the 25th of March 2017:
imo TBA > eraseme but that's mainly because I haven't seen any results of eraseme as they don't play in p2p. But TBA already beat GRS online so they've proven that they can be a top team.

afaik that was when they had fraz, and he can no longer go to lan
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
NL
Rep:
77%
Member
Post Likes: 1
Quote from GoTTiii on the 25th of March 2017:
imo TBA > eraseme but that's mainly because I haven't seen any results of eraseme as they don't play in p2p. But TBA already beat GRS online so they've proven that they can be a top team.
P2P isn't the only way to practice

Whatever seed or group we get, we are ready!
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
GB
Rep:
85%
Member
Post Likes: 3
Quote from darl1Ng on the 24th of March 2017:
I think that the pressure is on the top tier teams. Like putting teams in a wrong seed makes a top tier team at risk of getting grouped.

Can tell you've never been to LAN, the top tier teams will roll you over like they do online maybe even worse.
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
OP
BE
Rep:
83%
PC Platform Admin
Quote from FK1NGOD on the 25th of March 2017:
Quote from darl1Ng on the 24th of March 2017:
I think that the pressure is on the top tier teams. Like putting teams in a wrong seed makes a top tier team at risk of getting grouped.

Can tell you've never been to LAN, the top tier teams will roll you over like they do online maybe even worse.
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
OP
BE
Rep:
83%
PC Platform Admin
Quote from GoTTiii on the 25th of March 2017:
imo TBA > eraseme but that's mainly because I haven't seen any results of eraseme as they don't play in p2p. But TBA already beat GRS online so they've proven that they can be a top team.

Warpomega beat us online. Does that mean they can be a topteam too?
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago
IL
Rep:
85%
Member
Quote from uzuma on the 25th of March 2017:
Quote from GoTTiii on the 25th of March 2017:
imo TBA > eraseme but that's mainly because I haven't seen any results of eraseme as they don't play in p2p. But TBA already beat GRS online so they've proven that they can be a top team.

Warpomega beat us online. Does that mean they can be a topteam too?
What means which team is a top team or not
Quote
Downvote
Like
4 months ago

Ongoing PC PUGs:
View PCTodays Tournaments:
View All Featured Upcoming PC Tournament:
Advertisement:
Current events
Advertisement:
How good at your best game are you?
One of the top 20 players
Top 1% of players
Top 2% of players
Top 5% of players
Top 10% of players
Top 20% of players
Top 50% of players
Bottom 50% of players
2358 Votes